Demographics details for Union, IL vs Sikeston, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union, IL vs Sikeston, MO.
| Data | Union | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,767 | 16,073 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $54,090 | $47,464 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Union vs Sikeston
- In Union, the population is higher at 16,767, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- Residents in Union have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Union has a higher median income of $54,090 compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Union at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Sikeston.
- The poverty level is higher in Sikeston at 16%, compared to 6% in Union.
- The unemployment rate in Union is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Union vs Sikeston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 25 |
| White | 87 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 2% in Union.
- Union has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
- Both Union and Sikeston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union at 5% compared to 3% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sikeston at 7%, compared to 6% in Union.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union and Sikeston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.0% in Union.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sikeston at 24.6% versus 22.6% in Union.
- Sikeston has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 19.4% in Union.
- Binge drinking is more common in Union at 17.3% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 36.6% in Union.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sikeston at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Union.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (215) | 0.5% (76) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (3,386) | 23.0% (3,696) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (2,940) | 13.3% (2,142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (2,690) | 16.3% (2,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union vs Sikeston
- A higher percentage of residents in Union have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 20.2% in Union.
- More residents in Union have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 13.3% in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 16.0% in Union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.