Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Weirsdale, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Weirsdale, FL.

Data Union springs Weirsdale
Population 3,242 2,193
Median Age 28.1 years 45.0 years
Median Income $24,921 $55,000
Married Families 17.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 25% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Union springs vs Weirsdale

  • In Union springs, the population is higher at 3,242, compared to 2,193 in Weirsdale.
  • The median age in Weirsdale is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Weirsdale has a higher median income of $55,000, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • In Weirsdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 15% in Weirsdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Weirsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Union springs vs Weirsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union springs Weirsdale
Black 69 5
White 4 88
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 5
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Weirsdale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 5% in Weirsdale.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Weirsdale at 88% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union springs at 1% compared to 0% in Weirsdale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 5% in Weirsdale.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union springs at 4% compared to 2% in Weirsdale.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Weirsdale at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union springs Weirsdale
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 16.9% Data is updating%
Depression 20.8% Data is updating%
Smoking 25.5% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 11.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 49.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 15.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Weirsdale

  • More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union springs at 11.1% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union springs Weirsdale
No Schooling 3.6% (117) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.1% (489) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 33.7% (1,092) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (237) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Weirsdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Weirsdale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.