Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Sayreville, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Sayreville, NJ.

Data Union springs Sayreville
Population 3,242 45,123
Median Age 28.1 years 39.1 years
Median Income $24,921 $95,250
Married Families 17.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 25% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Union springs vs Sayreville

  • The population in Sayreville is higher at 45,123, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
  • The median age in Sayreville is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Sayreville has a higher median income of $95,250, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • In Sayreville, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 7% in Sayreville.
  • The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.1% in Sayreville.

Demographics

Demographics Union springs vs Sayreville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union springs Sayreville
Black 69 13
White 4 41
Asian 1 17
Hispanic 22 20
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Sayreville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 13% in Sayreville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sayreville at 41% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • In Sayreville, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 20% in Sayreville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sayreville at 9%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Sayreville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union springs Sayreville
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 16.9% 9.4%
Depression 20.8% 19.4%
Smoking 25.5% 12.8%
Binge Drinking 11.1% 14.8%
Obesity 49.5% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Sayreville

  • More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.9% in Sayreville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 19.4% in Sayreville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 12.8% in Sayreville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sayreville at 14.8% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 29.7% in Sayreville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Sayreville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union springs Sayreville
No Schooling 3.6% (117) 0.7% (311)
High School Diploma 15.1% (489) 18.0% (8,105)
Less than High School 33.7% (1,092) 9.7% (4,385)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (237) 27.3% (12,297)

Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Sayreville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.7% in Sayreville.
  • In Sayreville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 9.7% in Sayreville.
  • In Sayreville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.