Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Sacred heart, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Sacred heart, MN.

Data Union springs Sacred heart
Population 3,242 498
Median Age 28.1 years 53.5 years
Median Income $24,921 $59,107
Married Families 17.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 25% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Union springs vs Sacred heart

  • In Union springs, the population is higher at 3,242, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
  • The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Sacred heart has a higher median income of $59,107, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
  • The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.1% in Sacred heart.

Demographics

Demographics Union springs vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union springs Sacred heart
Black 69 Data is updating
White 4 87
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 13
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union springs at 1% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 13% in Sacred heart.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union springs at 4% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Sacred heart at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union springs Sacred heart
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 16.9% 9.6%
Depression 20.8% 23.3%
Smoking 25.5% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 11.1% 19.9%
Obesity 49.5% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Sacred heart

  • More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sacred heart at 23.3% versus 20.8% in Union springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Union springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union springs Sacred heart
No Schooling 3.6% (117) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.1% (489) 28.1% (140)
Less than High School 33.7% (1,092) 28.5% (142)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (237) 13.3% (66)

Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Sacred heart

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
  • In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 28.5% in Sacred heart.
  • In Sacred heart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.