Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Rosedale, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Rosedale, MD.
Data | Union springs | Rosedale |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,242 | 20,058 |
Median Age | 28.1 years | 40.9 years |
Median Income | $24,921 | $81,297 |
Married Families | 17.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Rosedale
- The population in Rosedale is higher at 20,058, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Rosedale is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Rosedale has a higher median income of $81,297, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Rosedale, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 10% in Rosedale.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Union springs and Rosedale at 5.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Rosedale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Union springs | Rosedale |
---|---|---|
Black | 69 | 41 |
White | 4 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 22 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Rosedale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 41% in Rosedale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rosedale at 38% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Rosedale, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 8% in Rosedale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rosedale at 7%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Rosedale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Union springs | Rosedale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 20.8% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 25.5% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Rosedale
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.4% in Rosedale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rosedale at 22.2% versus 20.8% in Union springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 14.6% in Rosedale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rosedale at 15.2% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 38.2% in Rosedale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Rosedale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Union springs | Rosedale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 1.3% (262) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 19.8% (3,973) |
Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 11.8% (2,371) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 16.3% (3,271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Rosedale
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.3% in Rosedale.
- In Rosedale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 11.8% in Rosedale.
- In Rosedale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.