Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Port arthur, TX.
| Data | Union springs | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,242 | 55,579 |
| Median Age | 28.1 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $24,921 | $45,357 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Port arthur
- The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Port arthur is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Port arthur has a higher median income of $45,357, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 23% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 5.2% in Union springs.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union springs | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 69 | 43 |
| White | 4 | 3 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Port arthur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 43% in Port arthur.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 4% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
- Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 22% in Union springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union springs | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 49.5% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Port arthur
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.5% in Port arthur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 23.3% in Port arthur.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port arthur at 13.9% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 42.2% in Port arthur.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Union springs and Port arthur at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union springs | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 2.5% (1,383) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 19.6% (10,902) |
| Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 23.7% (13,180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Port arthur
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.5% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 23.7% in Port arthur.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.