Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Ozona, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Ozona, TX.

Data Union springs Ozona
Population 3,242 2,306
Median Age 28.1 years 54.5 years
Median Income $24,921 $60,288
Married Families 17.0% 59.0%
Poverty Level 25% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Union springs vs Ozona

  • In Union springs, the population is higher at 3,242, compared to 2,306 in Ozona.
  • The median age in Ozona is higher at 54.5 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Ozona has a higher median income of $60,288, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • In Ozona, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 10% in Ozona.
  • The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Ozona.

Demographics

Demographics Union springs vs Ozona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union springs Ozona
Black 69 Data is updating
White 4 13
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 70
Two or More Races 4 17
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Ozona

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 0% in Ozona.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ozona at 13% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union springs at 1% compared to 0% in Ozona.
  • Ozona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 70%, compared to 22% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ozona at 17%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Ozona at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union springs Ozona
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.9% 12.4%
Depression 20.8% 21.5%
Smoking 25.5% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 11.1% 17.7%
Obesity 49.5% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Ozona

  • More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.4% in Ozona.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ozona at 21.5% versus 20.8% in Union springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 15.3% in Ozona.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ozona at 17.7% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 39.7% in Ozona.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Ozona.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union springs Ozona
No Schooling 3.6% (117) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.1% (489) 21.6% (498)
Less than High School 33.7% (1,092) 52.6% (1,212)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (237) 10.7% (246)

Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Ozona

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Ozona.
  • In Ozona, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ozona at 52.6%, compared to 33.7% in Union springs.
  • In Ozona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.