Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Oak park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Oak park, IL.
Data | Union springs | Oak park |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,242 | 52,553 |
Median Age | 28.1 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $24,921 | $103,264 |
Married Families | 17.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Oak park
- The population in Oak park is higher at 52,553, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Oak park is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Oak park has a higher median income of $103,264, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Oak park, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 5% in Oak park.
- Oak park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.2% in Union springs.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Oak park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Union springs | Oak park |
---|---|---|
Black | 69 | 19 |
White | 4 | 57 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 22 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Oak park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 19% in Oak park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oak park at 57% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Oak park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 9% in Oak park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak park at 9%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Oak park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Union springs | Oak park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 11.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 7.5% |
Depression | 20.8% | 16.2% |
Smoking | 25.5% | 8.8% |
Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Oak park
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 11.8% in Oak park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 16.2% in Oak park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 8.8% in Oak park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oak park at 18.7% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 27.2% in Oak park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Oak park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Union springs | Oak park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 0.2% (115) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 5.4% (2,820) |
Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 2.9% (1,544) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 51.9% (27,273) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Oak park
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.2% in Oak park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 5.4% in Oak park.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 2.9% in Oak park.
- In Oak park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.9% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.