Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Navajo dam, NM.
| Data | Union springs | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,242 | 330 |
| Median Age | 28.1 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $24,921 | $63,375 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Navajo dam
- In Union springs, the population is higher at 3,242, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Navajo dam has a higher median income of $63,375, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 14% in Navajo dam.
- The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union springs | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 69 | Data is updating |
| White | 4 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Navajo dam at 16% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Union springs at 1% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 22% in Union springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Navajo dam at 11%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union springs | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 49.5% | 32.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Navajo dam
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.2% in Navajo dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Navajo dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 15.0% in Navajo dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Navajo dam at 14.1% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 32.6% in Navajo dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Navajo dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union springs | Navajo dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 4.8% (16) |
| Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 6.1% (20) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.