Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Union springs | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,242 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 28.1 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $24,921 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 17.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Kings mountain
- The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Kings mountain has a higher median income of $45,301, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of married families is higher at 24.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Union springs | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | 69 | 25 |
White | 4 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 22 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 25% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union springs at 4% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Union springs | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.1% |
Depression | 20.8% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 25.5% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 49.5% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 20.8% in Union springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Union springs | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 17.8% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.