Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Hobbs, NM.
| Data | Union springs | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,242 | 39,648 |
| Median Age | 28.1 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $24,921 | $63,804 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Hobbs
- The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- The median age in Hobbs is higher at 30.8 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 15% in Hobbs.
- The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.9% in Hobbs.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union springs | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 69 | 6 |
| White | 4 | 4 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 22 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Hobbs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 6% in Hobbs.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Union springs and Hobbs at 4%.
- Both Union springs and Hobbs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 22% in Union springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Union springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union springs | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 49.5% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Hobbs
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.1% in Hobbs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 20.6% in Hobbs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 17.7% in Hobbs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 41.7% in Hobbs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union springs | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 2.2% (856) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 15.9% (6,312) |
| Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 26.2% (10,381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Hobbs
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.2% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 26.2% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.