Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Hesperia, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Hesperia, CA.

Data Union springs Hesperia
Population 3,242 100,744
Median Age 28.1 years 32.2 years
Median Income $24,921 $67,698
Married Families 17.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 25% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 6.9

Population Comparison: Union springs vs Hesperia

  • The population in Hesperia is higher at 100,744, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
  • The median age in Hesperia is higher at 32.2 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
  • Hesperia has a higher median income of $67,698, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
  • In Hesperia, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
  • Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 13% in Hesperia.
  • Hesperia has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.2% in Union springs.

Demographics

Demographics Union springs vs Hesperia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union springs Hesperia
Black 69 4
White 4 15
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 22 62
Two or More Races 4 16
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Hesperia

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 4% in Hesperia.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Hesperia at 15% compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • In Hesperia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Union springs.
  • Hesperia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 22% in Union springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hesperia at 16%, compared to 4% in Union springs.
  • In Hesperia, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Union springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union springs Hesperia
Mental Health Not Good 21.3% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 16.9% 14.2%
Depression 20.8% 20.1%
Smoking 25.5% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 11.1% 15.5%
Obesity 49.5% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Hesperia

  • More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.5% in Hesperia.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union springs at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Hesperia.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 16.0% in Hesperia.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hesperia at 15.5% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 40.4% in Hesperia.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Hesperia.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union springs Hesperia
No Schooling 3.6% (117) 1.6% (1,604)
High School Diploma 15.1% (489) 18.2% (18,342)
Less than High School 33.7% (1,092) 25.4% (25,622)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (237) 6.5% (6,534)

Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Hesperia

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.6% in Hesperia.
  • In Hesperia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
  • More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 25.4% in Hesperia.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 6.5% in Hesperia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.