Demographics details for Union springs, AL vs Cochranville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union springs, AL vs Cochranville, PA.
| Data | Union springs | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,242 | 488 |
| Median Age | 28.1 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $24,921 | $92,292 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Union springs vs Cochranville
- In Union springs, the population is higher at 3,242, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- The median age in Cochranville is higher at 49.6 years, compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292, compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- In Cochranville, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- The unemployment rate in Union springs is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Cochranville.
Demographics
Demographics Union springs vs Cochranville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union springs | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 69 | Data is updating |
| White | 4 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union springs vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union springs at 69% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochranville at 90% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Union springs at 1% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union springs at 22% compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- Both Union springs and Cochranville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union springs and Cochranville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union springs | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.9% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 25.5% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 49.5% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union springs vs Cochranville
- More residents in Union springs report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochranville at 24.1% versus 20.8% in Union springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union springs at 25.5% compared to 19.8% in Cochranville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union springs at 49.5% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union springs | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (117) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (489) | 24.4% (119) |
| Less than High School | 33.7% (1,092) | 15.6% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (237) | 13.7% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union springs vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of residents in Union springs have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 15.1% in Union springs.
- More residents in Union springs have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 15.6% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.