Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Pittsford, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Pittsford, VT.

Data Union grove Pittsford
Population 69 2,807
Median Age 52.9 years 42.0 years
Median Income $81,875 $65,000
Married Families 28.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 7% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 1.7

Population Comparison: Union grove vs Pittsford

  • The population in Pittsford is higher at 2,807, compared to 69 in Union grove.
  • Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 42.0 years in Pittsford.
  • Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $65,000 in Pittsford.
  • In Pittsford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
  • Union grove has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Pittsford.
  • The unemployment rate in Union grove is higher at 3.5%, compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.

Demographics

Demographics Union grove vs Pittsford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union grove Pittsford
Black 1 Data is updating
White 95 97
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races 1 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Pittsford

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union grove at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsford at 97% compared to 95% in Union grove.
  • In Pittsford, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Union grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union grove at 3% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
  • Both Union grove and Pittsford have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 1%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union grove and Pittsford at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union grove Pittsford
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% Data is updating%
Depression 22.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 33.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Pittsford

  • More residents in Union grove report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union grove at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union grove at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union grove at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union grove at 31.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union grove Pittsford
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 40.6% (28) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (8) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Pittsford

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Union grove and Pittsford at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.