Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Palmer, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Palmer, MA.

Data Union grove Palmer
Population 69 3,900
Median Age 52.9 years 42.0 years
Median Income $81,875 $65,000
Married Families 28.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Union grove vs Palmer

  • The population in Palmer is higher at 3,900, compared to 69 in Union grove.
  • Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 42.0 years in Palmer.
  • Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $65,000 in Palmer.
  • In Palmer, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Palmer at 10%, compared to 7% in Union grove.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Union grove and Palmer at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Union grove vs Palmer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union grove Palmer
Black 1 1
White 95 96
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 1 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Palmer

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Union grove and Palmer at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Palmer at 96% compared to 95% in Union grove.
  • In Palmer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Union grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union grove at 3% compared to 2% in Palmer.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union grove at 1% compared to 0% in Palmer.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union grove and Palmer at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union grove Palmer
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% Data is updating%
Depression 22.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 18.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 33.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Palmer

  • More residents in Union grove report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union grove at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union grove at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union grove at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union grove at 31.4% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union grove Palmer
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 40.6% (28) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (8) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Palmer

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Union grove and Palmer at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.