Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Little falls, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Little falls, MN.

Data Union grove Little falls
Population 69 9,094
Median Age 52.9 years 40.8 years
Median Income $81,875 $44,455
Married Families 28.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 7% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Union grove vs Little falls

  • The population in Little falls is higher at 9,094, compared to 69 in Union grove.
  • Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 40.8 years in Little falls.
  • Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • In Little falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 7% in Union grove.
  • Little falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Union grove.

Demographics

Demographics Union grove vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union grove Little falls
Black 1 Data is updating
White 95 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 1
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Little falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union grove at 1% compared to 0% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Union grove and Little falls at 95%.
  • In Little falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Union grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union grove at 3% compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little falls at 3%, compared to 1% in Union grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union grove and Little falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union grove Little falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 10.9%
Depression 22.6% 25.0%
Smoking 15.7% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 20.6%
Obesity 31.4% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Little falls

  • More residents in Union grove report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 22.6% in Union grove.
  • Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 18.1% in Union grove.
  • Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 17.0% in Little falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union grove Little falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (63)
High School Diploma 40.6% (28) 25.4% (2,308)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.7% (1,063)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (8) 14.3% (1,301)

Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 25.4% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little falls at 11.7%, compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • In Little falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.