Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Harrison, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Harrison, AR.
Data | Union grove | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Population | 69 | 13,338 |
Median Age | 52.9 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $81,875 | $39,677 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Union grove vs Harrison
- The population in Harrison is higher at 13,338, compared to 69 in Union grove.
- Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 41.8 years in Harrison.
- Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- In Harrison, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Harrison at 15%, compared to 7% in Union grove.
- Harrison has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Union grove.
Demographics
Demographics Union grove vs Harrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Union grove | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Harrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union grove at 1% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Union grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 92% in Harrison.
- Both Union grove and Harrison have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Union grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrison at 4%, compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union grove and Harrison at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Union grove | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 15.1% |
Depression | 22.6% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 24.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.9% in Union grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrison at 28.9% versus 22.6% in Union grove.
- Harrison has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Union grove at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Harrison has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 18.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Union grove | Harrison |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (115) |
High School Diploma | 40.6% (28) | 21.0% (2,807) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.5% (1,665) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (8) | 13.1% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 21.0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrison at 12.5%, compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- In Harrison, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.