Demographics details for Union city, TN vs Helena, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, TN vs Helena, MT.
| Data | Union city | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,985 | 33,885 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $42,620 | $64,798 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Helena
- The population in Helena is higher at 33,885, compared to 10,985 in Union city.
- The median age in Helena is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.4 years in Union city.
- Helena has a higher median income of $64,798, compared to $42,620 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Union city at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Helena.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Helena.
- The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Helena.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Helena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Helena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 23% compared to 1% in Helena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Helena at 88% compared to 61% in Union city.
- In Helena, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 8% compared to 5% in Helena.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 8% compared to 4% in Helena.
- In Helena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Helena
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 14.8% in Helena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union city at 29.8% compared to 23.5% in Helena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 27.9% compared to 13.1% in Helena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Helena at 21.9% compared to 13.0% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 39.7% compared to 30.4% in Helena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Helena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Helena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (60) | 0.1% (38) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,309) | 10.0% (3,385) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (2,016) | 4.7% (1,597) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,408) | 34.3% (11,632) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Helena
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Helena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Helena.
- More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 4.7% in Helena.
- In Helena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.