Demographics details for Union city, TN vs Ferndale, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, TN vs Ferndale, WA.
| Data | Union city | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,985 | 15,840 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $42,620 | $82,466 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Ferndale
- The population in Ferndale is higher at 15,840, compared to 10,985 in Union city.
- Residents in Union city have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 32.9 years in Ferndale.
- Ferndale has a higher median income of $82,466, compared to $42,620 in Union city.
- In Ferndale, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 6% in Ferndale.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Union city and Ferndale at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Ferndale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Ferndale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 23% compared to 0% in Ferndale.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ferndale at 71% compared to 61% in Union city.
- In Ferndale, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Union city.
- Ferndale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 8% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 8% compared to 7% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 27.9% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 25.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Ferndale
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 17.4% in Ferndale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ferndale at 29.9% versus 29.8% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 27.9% compared to 14.4% in Ferndale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ferndale at 18.1% compared to 13.0% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 39.7% compared to 25.3% in Ferndale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Ferndale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Ferndale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (60) | 1.2% (186) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,309) | 11.5% (1,827) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (2,016) | 6.2% (979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (1,408) | 20.5% (3,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Ferndale
- In Ferndale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 11.5% in Ferndale.
- More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 6.2% in Ferndale.
- In Ferndale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.