Demographics details for Union city, PA vs Broadalbin, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, PA vs Broadalbin, NY.
| Data | Union city | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,887 | 5,158 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,764 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Broadalbin
- The population in Broadalbin is higher at 5,158, compared to 2,887 in Union city.
- Residents in Union city have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 40.0 years in Broadalbin.
- Broadalbin has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $41,764 in Union city.
- In Broadalbin, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 40.0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Broadalbin.
- The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Broadalbin.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Broadalbin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Broadalbin
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Union city and Broadalbin at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broadalbin at 95% compared to 91% in Union city.
- In Broadalbin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 4% compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 5% compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union city and Broadalbin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Broadalbin
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union city at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 25.3% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Union city at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 39.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Broadalbin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 42.5% (1,226) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.5% (476) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (237) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Broadalbin
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 42.5% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.