Environment details: Union city GA
Water quality is poor and needs improvements.
Environment details: Stanchfield MN
Water quality acceptable; no major pollution sources.
Compare Environment: Union city GA vs Stanchfield MN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Union city | Stanchfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 993 | 665 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality is poor and needs improvements. | Water quality acceptable; no major pollution sources. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 47 | 17 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Union city vs Stanchfield
- The water quality in Stanchfield is superior at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Union city.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Union city with 1.69 compared to 1.6 in Stanchfield.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Union city at 47 compared to 17 in Stanchfield.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.