Demographics details for Union city, GA vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, GA vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Union city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,895 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,696 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 33.6 years, compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 6.1% in Union city.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 85 | 21 |
| White | 6 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 85% compared to 21% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 10% compared to 6% in Union city.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Union city.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 5% in Union city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 4% in Union city.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 17.7% versus 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 36.6% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (129) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (3,681) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (2,166) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (4,828) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.