Demographics details for Union city, GA vs Bee, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, GA vs Bee, NE.
| Data | Union city | Bee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,895 | 169 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,696 | $63,750 |
| Married Families | 17.0% | 68.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Bee
- In Union city, the population is higher at 27,895, compared to 169 in Bee.
- The median age in Bee is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Bee has a higher median income of $63,750, compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- In Bee, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Bee.
- The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 6.1%, compared to 2.5% in Bee.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Bee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Bee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 85 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Bee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 85% compared to 0% in Bee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bee at 99% compared to 6% in Union city.
- Both Union city and Bee have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 5% compared to 0% in Bee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 4% compared to 1% in Bee.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union city and Bee at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Bee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 16.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.5% | 22.4% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 37.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Bee
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in Bee.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union city at 17.2% compared to 16.7% in Bee.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 18.0% compared to 13.6% in Bee.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bee at 22.4% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 36.6% compared to 35.0% in Bee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bee at 37.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Bee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (129) | 1.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (3,681) | 26.6% (45) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (2,166) | 8.3% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (4,828) | 10.1% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Bee
- In Bee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- In Bee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bee at 8.3%, compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 10.1% in Bee.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.