Demographics details for Union city, CA vs Pittsfield, NH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union city, CA vs Pittsfield, NH.

Data Union city Pittsfield
Population 67,039 4,140
Median Age 41.3 years 42.0 years
Median Income $138,013 $64,600
Married Families 50.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 2.6

Population Comparison: Union city vs Pittsfield

  • In Union city, the population is higher at 67,039, compared to 4,140 in Pittsfield.
  • The median age in Pittsfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 41.3 years in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher median income of $138,013 compared to $64,600 in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Union city at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Union city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Pittsfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.6% in Pittsfield.

Demographics

Demographics Union city vs Pittsfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union city Pittsfield
Black 5 Data is updating
White 6 100
Asian 58 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Pittsfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 5% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsfield at 100% compared to 6% in Union city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union city at 58% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 21% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 9% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Union city at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union city Pittsfield
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% Data is updating%
Depression 13.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 8.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 13.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 21.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Pittsfield

  • More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union city at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 8.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union city at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union city Pittsfield
No Schooling 2.7% (1,812) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.2% (9,499) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 15.3% (10,264) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.7% (23,285) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Pittsfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.