Demographics details for Union city, CA vs Mount hermon, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union city, CA vs Mount hermon, LA.

Data Union city Mount hermon
Population 67,039 118
Median Age 41.3 years 43.0 years
Median Income $138,013 $49,500
Married Families 50.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.0

Population Comparison: Union city vs Mount hermon

  • In Union city, the population is higher at 67,039, compared to 118 in Mount hermon.
  • The median age in Mount hermon is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 41.3 years in Union city.
  • Union city has a higher median income of $138,013 compared to $49,500 in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Union city at 50.0% compared to 27.0% in Mount hermon.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mount hermon at 12%, compared to 9% in Union city.
  • Mount hermon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.7% in Union city.

Demographics

Demographics Union city vs Mount hermon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union city Mount hermon
Black 5 Data is updating
White 6 97
Asian 58 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 2
Two or More Races 9 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 5% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount hermon at 97% compared to 6% in Union city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union city at 58% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 21% compared to 2% in Mount hermon.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 9% compared to 1% in Mount hermon.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Union city at 1% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union city Mount hermon
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% Data is updating%
Depression 13.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 8.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 13.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 21.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 9.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Mount hermon

  • More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Union city at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 8.6% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union city at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Union city at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union city Mount hermon
No Schooling 2.7% (1,812) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.2% (9,499) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 15.3% (10,264) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.7% (23,285) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.