Demographics details for Union city, CA vs Hazlehurst, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union city, CA vs Hazlehurst, MS.

Data Union city Hazlehurst
Population 67,039 3,497
Median Age 41.3 years 36.5 years
Median Income $138,013 $38,365
Married Families 50.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 9% 30%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.3

Population Comparison: Union city vs Hazlehurst

  • In Union city, the population is higher at 67,039, compared to 3,497 in Hazlehurst.
  • Residents in Union city have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 36.5 years in Hazlehurst.
  • Union city has a higher median income of $138,013 compared to $38,365 in Hazlehurst.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Union city at 50.0% compared to 24.0% in Hazlehurst.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hazlehurst at 30%, compared to 9% in Union city.
  • The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.3% in Hazlehurst.

Demographics

Demographics Union city vs Hazlehurst provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union city Hazlehurst
Black 5 86
White 6 6
Asian 58 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 8
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Hazlehurst

  • In Hazlehurst, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 5% in Union city.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Union city and Hazlehurst at 6%.
  • The Asian population is larger in Union city at 58% compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 21% compared to 8% in Hazlehurst.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 9% compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Union city at 1% compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union city Hazlehurst
Mental Health Not Good 12.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 15.5%
Depression 13.9% 19.9%
Smoking 8.6% 24.9%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 11.3%
Obesity 21.7% 48.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Hazlehurst

  • In Hazlehurst, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hazlehurst at 19.9% versus 13.9% in Union city.
  • Hazlehurst has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Union city at 13.7% compared to 11.3% in Hazlehurst.
  • Hazlehurst has higher obesity rates at 48.7% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazlehurst at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Union city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union city Hazlehurst
No Schooling 2.7% (1,812) 2.7% (95)
High School Diploma 14.2% (9,499) 16.1% (562)
Less than High School 15.3% (10,264) 15.5% (541)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.7% (23,285) 16.4% (573)

Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Hazlehurst

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Union city and Hazlehurst at 2.7%.
  • In Hazlehurst, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 14.2% in Union city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazlehurst at 15.5%, compared to 15.3% in Union city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 16.4% in Hazlehurst.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.