Demographics details for Union city, CA vs Brookline, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, CA vs Brookline, MA.
| Data | Union city | Brookline |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,039 | 62,698 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $138,013 | $130,600 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Brookline
- In Union city, the population is higher at 67,039, compared to 62,698 in Brookline.
- Residents in Union city have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Brookline.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013 compared to $130,600 in Brookline.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Union city at 50.0% compared to 38.0% in Brookline.
- Union city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Brookline.
- The unemployment rate in Union city is higher at 4.7%, compared to 2.5% in Brookline.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Brookline provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union city | Brookline |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 6 | 64 |
| Asian | 58 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Brookline
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 5% compared to 3% in Brookline.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookline at 64% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Union city at 58% compared to 18% in Brookline.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 21% compared to 7% in Brookline.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 9% compared to 8% in Brookline.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Union city at 1% compared to 0% in Brookline.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union city | Brookline |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 13.9% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 21.7% | 22.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Brookline
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 12.7% in Brookline.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookline at 19.5% versus 13.9% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Union city at 8.6% compared to 8.1% in Brookline.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brookline at 18.1% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Brookline has higher obesity rates at 22.9% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Brookline.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union city | Brookline |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (1,812) | 0.5% (288) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (9,499) | 3.2% (1,995) |
| Less than High School | 15.3% (10,264) | 2.3% (1,437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.7% (23,285) | 56.6% (35,500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Brookline
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Brookline.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 3.2% in Brookline.
- More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 2.3% in Brookline.
- In Brookline, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.6% compared to 34.7% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.