Demographics details for Union city, CA vs Bartlett, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union city, CA vs Bartlett, IL.
Data | Union city | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Population | 67,039 | 40,154 |
Median Age | 41.3 years | 41.1 years |
Median Income | $138,013 | $126,555 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Union city vs Bartlett
- In Union city, the population is higher at 67,039, compared to 40,154 in Bartlett.
- Residents in Union city have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 41.1 years in Bartlett.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013 compared to $126,555 in Bartlett.
- In Bartlett, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 50.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is identical in both Union city and Bartlett at 9%.
- Bartlett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.7% in Union city.
Demographics
Demographics Union city vs Bartlett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Union city | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 4 |
White | 6 | 58 |
Asian | 58 | 17 |
Hispanic | 21 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Union city vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union city at 5% compared to 4% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bartlett at 58% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Union city at 58% compared to 17% in Bartlett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union city at 21% compared to 15% in Bartlett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union city at 9% compared to 5% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union city and Bartlett at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Union city | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 8.2% |
Depression | 13.9% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 8.6% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 21.7% | 27.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union city vs Bartlett
- More residents in Union city report poor mental health at 12.8% compared to 12.7% in Bartlett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bartlett at 17.2% versus 13.9% in Union city.
- Bartlett has a higher smoking rate at 11.4% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bartlett at 17.7% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Bartlett has higher obesity rates at 27.9% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union city at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Bartlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Union city | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (1,812) | 0.8% (341) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (9,499) | 13.5% (5,427) |
Less than High School | 15.3% (10,264) | 6.1% (2,440) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.7% (23,285) | 34.2% (13,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union city vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Bartlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.5% in Bartlett.
- More residents in Union city have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 6.1% in Bartlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 34.2% in Bartlett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.