Demographics details for Ulster park, NY vs Lexington, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ulster park, NY vs Lexington, NC.

Data Ulster park Lexington
Population 1,865 19,679
Median Age 42.0 years 38.6 years
Median Income $70,000 $36,868
Married Families 50.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Ulster park vs Lexington

  • The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 1,865 in Ulster park.
  • Residents in Ulster park have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
  • Ulster park has a higher median income of $70,000 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ulster park at 50.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 6% in Ulster park.
  • Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Ulster park.

Demographics

Demographics Ulster park vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ulster park Lexington
Black 5 31
White 90 38
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 3 16
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ulster park vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 5% in Ulster park.
  • Ulster park has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 38% in Lexington.
  • In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Ulster park.
  • Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Ulster park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 0% in Ulster park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ulster park and Lexington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ulster park Lexington
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.5%
Depression Data is updating% 25.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 24.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 42.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ulster park vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ulster park Lexington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.7% (531)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.0% (3,355)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 25.6% (5,036)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.2% (2,009)

Education Levels Comparison: Ulster park vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.