Demographics details for Ulster park, NY vs Heber springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ulster park, NY vs Heber springs, AR.

Data Ulster park Heber springs
Population 1,865 7,201
Median Age 42.0 years 43.1 years
Median Income $70,000 $50,472
Married Families 50.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.0

Population Comparison: Ulster park vs Heber springs

  • The population in Heber springs is higher at 7,201, compared to 1,865 in Ulster park.
  • The median age in Heber springs is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 42.0 years in Ulster park.
  • Ulster park has a higher median income of $70,000 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ulster park at 50.0% compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Heber springs at 12%, compared to 6% in Ulster park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Ulster park and Heber springs at 4.0%.

Demographics

Demographics Ulster park vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ulster park Heber springs
Black 5 1
White 90 92
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Ulster park vs Heber springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ulster park at 5% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Heber springs at 92% compared to 90% in Ulster park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Ulster park at 2% compared to 0% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Ulster park and Heber springs at 3%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Heber springs at 3%, compared to 0% in Ulster park.
  • In Heber springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ulster park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ulster park Heber springs
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.5%
Depression Data is updating% 26.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ulster park vs Heber springs

  • In Heber springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Heber springs at 26.3% versus 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Heber springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Heber springs at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • Heber springs has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ulster park Heber springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.5% (1,694)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.1% (1,088)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.5% (756)

Education Levels Comparison: Ulster park vs Heber springs

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ulster park and Heber springs at 0.0%.
  • In Heber springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heber springs at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.
  • In Heber springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 0.0% in Ulster park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.