Demographics details for Two rivers, WI vs Crawford, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Two rivers, WI vs Crawford, TX.
| Data | Two rivers | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,166 | 913 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,236 | $78,333 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Two rivers vs Crawford
- In Two rivers, the population is higher at 11,166, compared to 913 in Crawford.
- Residents in Two rivers have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 44.1 years in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $78,333, compared to $56,236 in Two rivers.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 42.0% in Two rivers.
- Two rivers has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.1% in Two rivers.
Demographics
Demographics Two rivers vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Two rivers | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 86 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Two rivers vs Crawford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Two rivers and Crawford at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawford at 88% compared to 86% in Two rivers.
- The Asian population is larger in Two rivers at 1% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Two rivers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Two rivers at 5% compared to 3% in Crawford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Two rivers and Crawford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Two rivers | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 13.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.7% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Two rivers vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Two rivers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Two rivers at 24.3% compared to 24.1% in Crawford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Two rivers at 18.0% compared to 13.1% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Two rivers at 23.7% compared to 20.0% in Crawford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Two rivers at 36.7% compared to 33.5% in Crawford.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Two rivers and Crawford at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Two rivers | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (83) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (2,745) | 28.7% (262) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (974) | 3.5% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (1,912) | 11.5% (105) |
Education Levels Comparison: Two rivers vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of residents in Two rivers have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 24.6% in Two rivers.
- More residents in Two rivers have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Two rivers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 11.5% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.