Demographics details for Twinsburg, OH vs Sedona, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Twinsburg, OH vs Sedona, AZ.
| Data | Twinsburg | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,416 | 9,790 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 58.7 years |
| Median Income | $91,554 | $62,901 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Twinsburg vs Sedona
- In Twinsburg, the population is higher at 19,416, compared to 9,790 in Sedona.
- The median age in Sedona is higher at 58.7 years, compared to 43.6 years in Twinsburg.
- Twinsburg has a higher median income of $91,554 compared to $62,901 in Sedona.
- In Sedona, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 43.0% in Twinsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Sedona at 10%, compared to 5% in Twinsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Twinsburg is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.3% in Sedona.
Demographics
Demographics Twinsburg vs Sedona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Twinsburg | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 1 |
| White | 69 | 73 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Twinsburg vs Sedona
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Twinsburg at 17% compared to 1% in Sedona.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sedona at 73% compared to 69% in Twinsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Twinsburg at 7% compared to 3% in Sedona.
- Sedona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 3% in Twinsburg.
- Both Twinsburg and Sedona have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Twinsburg and Sedona at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Twinsburg | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 14.7% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Twinsburg vs Sedona
- More residents in Twinsburg report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Sedona.
- Depression is more prevalent in Twinsburg at 22.4% compared to 19.7% in Sedona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Twinsburg at 14.7% compared to 12.0% in Sedona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Twinsburg at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Sedona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Twinsburg at 38.9% compared to 24.5% in Sedona.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sedona at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Twinsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Twinsburg | Sedona |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (135) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,173) | 12.3% (1,206) |
| Less than High School | 4.8% (931) | 8.4% (827) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.2% (6,065) | 44.7% (4,375) |
Education Levels Comparison: Twinsburg vs Sedona
- A higher percentage of residents in Twinsburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Sedona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Twinsburg hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 12.3% in Sedona.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sedona at 8.4%, compared to 4.8% in Twinsburg.
- In Sedona, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.7% compared to 31.2% in Twinsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.