Demographics details for Twinsburg, OH vs Latah, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Twinsburg, OH vs Latah, WA.
Data | Twinsburg | Latah |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,416 | 176 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $91,554 | $46,563 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Twinsburg vs Latah
- In Twinsburg, the population is higher at 19,416, compared to 176 in Latah.
- Residents in Twinsburg have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 40.0 years in Latah.
- Twinsburg has a higher median income of $91,554 compared to $46,563 in Latah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Twinsburg at 43.0% compared to 23.0% in Latah.
- Twinsburg has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Latah.
- Latah has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Twinsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Twinsburg vs Latah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Twinsburg | Latah |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 2 |
White | 69 | 89 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Twinsburg vs Latah
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Twinsburg at 17% compared to 2% in Latah.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Latah at 89% compared to 69% in Twinsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Twinsburg at 7% compared to 0% in Latah.
- Latah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Twinsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Latah at 5%, compared to 4% in Twinsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Twinsburg and Latah at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Twinsburg | Latah |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 11.8% |
Depression | 22.4% | 29.5% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 15.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 38.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Twinsburg vs Latah
- In Latah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.1% in Twinsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Latah at 29.5% versus 22.4% in Twinsburg.
- Latah has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 14.7% in Twinsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Twinsburg at 18.4% compared to 18.0% in Latah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Twinsburg at 38.9% compared to 30.2% in Latah.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Latah at 38.0% compared to 9.0% in Twinsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Twinsburg | Latah |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (135) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (3,173) | 26.7% (47) |
Less than High School | 4.8% (931) | 0.6% (1) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.2% (6,065) | 11.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Twinsburg vs Latah
- A higher percentage of residents in Twinsburg have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Latah.
- In Latah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.7% compared to 16.3% in Twinsburg.
- More residents in Twinsburg have less than a high school education at 4.8% compared to 0.6% in Latah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Twinsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 11.9% in Latah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.