Demographics details for Twentynine palms, CA vs Keiser, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Twentynine palms, CA vs Keiser, AR.

Data Twentynine palms Keiser
Population 28,158 713
Median Age 24.5 years 41.6 years
Median Income $51,392 $50,136
Married Families 37.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Keiser

  • In Twentynine palms, the population is higher at 28,158, compared to 713 in Keiser.
  • The median age in Keiser is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 24.5 years in Twentynine palms.
  • Twentynine palms has a higher median income of $51,392 compared to $50,136 in Keiser.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Twentynine palms at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Keiser.
  • The poverty level is higher in Keiser at 12%, compared to 11% in Twentynine palms.
  • The unemployment rate in Twentynine palms is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.5% in Keiser.

Demographics

Demographics Twentynine palms vs Keiser provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Twentynine palms Keiser
Black 9 4
White 40 83
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 26 1
Two or More Races 21 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Keiser

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Twentynine palms at 9% compared to 4% in Keiser.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Keiser at 83% compared to 40% in Twentynine palms.
  • The Asian population is larger in Twentynine palms at 3% compared to 0% in Keiser.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Twentynine palms at 26% compared to 1% in Keiser.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Twentynine palms at 21% compared to 12% in Keiser.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Twentynine palms at 1% compared to 0% in Keiser.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Twentynine palms Keiser
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 14.6%
Depression 20.6% 28.9%
Smoking 16.4% 24.9%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.2%
Obesity 39.3% 34.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Keiser

  • In Keiser, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.7% in Twentynine palms.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Keiser at 28.9% versus 20.6% in Twentynine palms.
  • Keiser has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 16.4% in Twentynine palms.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Twentynine palms at 16.1% compared to 15.2% in Keiser.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Twentynine palms at 39.3% compared to 34.9% in Keiser.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keiser at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Twentynine palms.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Twentynine palms Keiser
No Schooling 0.4% (115) 6.2% (44)
High School Diploma 9.0% (2,543) 15.0% (107)
Less than High School 6.5% (1,818) 55.5% (396)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.6% (3,560) 7.3% (52)

Education Levels Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Keiser

  • In Keiser, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.4% in Twentynine palms.
  • In Keiser, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Twentynine palms.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keiser at 55.5%, compared to 6.5% in Twentynine palms.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Twentynine palms hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 7.3% in Keiser.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.