Demographics details for Twentynine palms, CA vs Friendship, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Twentynine palms, CA vs Friendship, WI.

Data Twentynine palms Friendship
Population 28,158 681
Median Age 24.5 years 50.3 years
Median Income $51,392 $45,208
Married Families 37.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Friendship

  • In Twentynine palms, the population is higher at 28,158, compared to 681 in Friendship.
  • The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 24.5 years in Twentynine palms.
  • Twentynine palms has a higher median income of $51,392 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Twentynine palms at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
  • The poverty level is higher in Friendship at 12%, compared to 11% in Twentynine palms.
  • The unemployment rate in Twentynine palms is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.5% in Friendship.

Demographics

Demographics Twentynine palms vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Twentynine palms Friendship
Black 9 5
White 40 84
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 26 1
Two or More Races 21 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Friendship

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Twentynine palms at 9% compared to 5% in Friendship.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 40% in Twentynine palms.
  • The Asian population is larger in Twentynine palms at 3% compared to 0% in Friendship.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Twentynine palms at 26% compared to 1% in Friendship.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Twentynine palms at 21% compared to 9% in Friendship.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Twentynine palms and Friendship at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Twentynine palms Friendship
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.4%
Depression 20.6% 24.3%
Smoking 16.4% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 23.9%
Obesity 39.3% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Friendship

  • More residents in Twentynine palms report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 20.6% in Twentynine palms.
  • Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.4% in Twentynine palms.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 16.1% in Twentynine palms.
  • Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.3%.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Twentynine palms.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Twentynine palms Friendship
No Schooling 0.4% (115) 0.4% (3)
High School Diploma 9.0% (2,543) 26.9% (183)
Less than High School 6.5% (1,818) 26.0% (177)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.6% (3,560) 3.2% (22)

Education Levels Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Friendship

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Twentynine palms and Friendship at 0.4%.
  • In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 9.0% in Twentynine palms.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 6.5% in Twentynine palms.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Twentynine palms hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.