Demographics details for Twentynine palms, CA vs Fairburn, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Twentynine palms, CA vs Fairburn, GA.

Data Twentynine palms Fairburn
Population 28,158 16,956
Median Age 24.5 years 30.9 years
Median Income $51,392 $67,245
Married Families 37.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 11% 15%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 4.2

Population Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Fairburn

  • In Twentynine palms, the population is higher at 28,158, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
  • The median age in Fairburn is higher at 30.9 years, compared to 24.5 years in Twentynine palms.
  • Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $51,392 in Twentynine palms.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Twentynine palms at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 11% in Twentynine palms.
  • The unemployment rate in Twentynine palms is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.

Demographics

Demographics Twentynine palms vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Twentynine palms Fairburn
Black 9 73
White 40 12
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 26 12
Two or More Races 21 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Fairburn

  • In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 9% in Twentynine palms.
  • Twentynine palms has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
  • The Asian population is larger in Twentynine palms at 3% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Twentynine palms at 26% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Twentynine palms at 21% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Twentynine palms at 1% compared to 0% in Fairburn.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Twentynine palms Fairburn
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 10.9%
Depression 20.6% 16.8%
Smoking 16.4% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.0%
Obesity 39.3% 33.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Fairburn

  • More residents in Twentynine palms report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Twentynine palms at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Twentynine palms at 16.4% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Twentynine palms at 16.1% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Twentynine palms at 39.3% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Twentynine palms at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Twentynine palms Fairburn
No Schooling 0.4% (115) 0.5% (78)
High School Diploma 9.0% (2,543) 12.3% (2,082)
Less than High School 6.5% (1,818) 5.7% (961)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.6% (3,560) 21.2% (3,591)

Education Levels Comparison: Twentynine palms vs Fairburn

  • In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Twentynine palms.
  • In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 9.0% in Twentynine palms.
  • More residents in Twentynine palms have less than a high school education at 6.5% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
  • In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.6% in Twentynine palms.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.