Demographics details for Tuscumbia, MO vs Valdosta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tuscumbia, MO vs Valdosta, GA.
| Data | Tuscumbia | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 190 | 55,074 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 29.2 years |
| Median Income | $44,375 | $41,365 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Valdosta
- The population in Valdosta is higher at 55,074, compared to 190 in Tuscumbia.
- Residents in Tuscumbia have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Tuscumbia has a higher median income of $44,375 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 21.0% in Tuscumbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 10% in Tuscumbia.
- Valdosta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Tuscumbia.
Demographics
Demographics Tuscumbia vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tuscumbia | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 56 |
| White | 78 | 34 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 17% in Tuscumbia.
- Tuscumbia has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- The Asian population is larger in Tuscumbia at 2% compared to 1% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Valdosta at 4%, compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tuscumbia and Valdosta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tuscumbia | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.2% in Tuscumbia.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 22.2%.
- Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 22.5% in Tuscumbia.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tuscumbia at 19.5% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 40.0% in Tuscumbia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Valdosta at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscumbia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tuscumbia | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (538) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (33) | 16.3% (8,967) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (36) | 8.9% (4,906) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.7% (9) | 15.9% (8,750) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Tuscumbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tuscumbia hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Valdosta.
- More residents in Tuscumbia have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 8.9% in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 4.7% in Tuscumbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.