Demographics details for Tuscaloosa, AL vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tuscaloosa, AL vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Tuscaloosa | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 110,602 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,257 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Tuscaloosa vs Stillwater
- In Tuscaloosa, the population is higher at 110,602, compared to 49,160 in Stillwater.
- Residents in Tuscaloosa have a higher median age of 28.8 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher median income of $47,257 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tuscaloosa at 26.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 16% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.
Demographics
Demographics Tuscaloosa vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tuscaloosa | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 41 | 5 |
| White | 49 | 72 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Tuscaloosa vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tuscaloosa at 41% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stillwater at 72% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Tuscaloosa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tuscaloosa | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tuscaloosa vs Stillwater
- More residents in Tuscaloosa report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.1% in Stillwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tuscaloosa at 19.6% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tuscaloosa at 14.4% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tuscaloosa at 44.5% compared to 42.0% in Stillwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stillwater at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tuscaloosa | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (721) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (13,878) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (6,781) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (22,425) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tuscaloosa vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Tuscaloosa have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tuscaloosa hold a high school diploma at 12.5% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Tuscaloosa have less than a high school education at 6.1% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 20.3% in Tuscaloosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.