Demographics details for Turtle creek, PA vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Turtle creek, PA vs Chandler, OK.
Data | Turtle creek | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,987 | 2,895 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $42,344 | $48,168 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Turtle creek vs Chandler
- In Turtle creek, the population is higher at 4,987, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- Residents in Turtle creek have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 40.5 years in Chandler.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168, compared to $42,344 in Turtle creek.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 19.0% in Turtle creek.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 12% in Turtle creek.
- The unemployment rate in Turtle creek is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Turtle creek vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Turtle creek | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 9 |
White | 60 | 72 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Turtle creek vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Turtle creek at 26% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 60% in Turtle creek.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Turtle creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Turtle creek at 2% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 11% in Turtle creek.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Turtle creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Turtle creek | Chandler |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.7% |
Depression | 24.6% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Turtle creek vs Chandler
- More residents in Turtle creek report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Chandler.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.6%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Turtle creek at 25.3% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- Binge drinking is more common in Turtle creek at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Chandler.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 38.0% in Turtle creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Turtle creek at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Turtle creek | Chandler |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (98) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (1,007) | 23.9% (691) |
Less than High School | 19.0% (948) | 12.8% (372) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (433) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Turtle creek vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Turtle creek have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 20.2% in Turtle creek.
- More residents in Turtle creek have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 12.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 8.7% in Turtle creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.