Demographics details for Turtle creek, PA vs Bartlett, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Turtle creek, PA vs Bartlett, IL.
Data | Turtle creek | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,987 | 40,154 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 41.1 years |
Median Income | $42,344 | $126,555 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Turtle creek vs Bartlett
- The population in Bartlett is higher at 40,154, compared to 4,987 in Turtle creek.
- Residents in Turtle creek have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 41.1 years in Bartlett.
- Bartlett has a higher median income of $126,555, compared to $42,344 in Turtle creek.
- In Bartlett, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 19.0% in Turtle creek.
- Turtle creek has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Bartlett.
- Bartlett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.5% in Turtle creek.
Demographics
Demographics Turtle creek vs Bartlett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Turtle creek | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 4 |
White | 60 | 58 |
Asian | 1 | 17 |
Hispanic | 2 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Turtle creek vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Turtle creek at 26% compared to 4% in Bartlett.
- Turtle creek has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 58% in Bartlett.
- In Bartlett, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Turtle creek.
- Bartlett has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Turtle creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Turtle creek at 11% compared to 5% in Bartlett.
- In Bartlett, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Turtle creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Turtle creek | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 8.2% |
Depression | 24.6% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 38.0% | 27.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Turtle creek vs Bartlett
- More residents in Turtle creek report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 12.7% in Bartlett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Turtle creek at 24.6% compared to 17.2% in Bartlett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Turtle creek at 25.3% compared to 11.4% in Bartlett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Turtle creek at 18.8% compared to 17.7% in Bartlett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Turtle creek at 38.0% compared to 27.9% in Bartlett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Turtle creek at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Bartlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Turtle creek | Bartlett |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (98) | 0.8% (341) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (1,007) | 13.5% (5,427) |
Less than High School | 19.0% (948) | 6.1% (2,440) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (433) | 34.2% (13,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Turtle creek vs Bartlett
- A higher percentage of residents in Turtle creek have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Bartlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Turtle creek hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 13.5% in Bartlett.
- More residents in Turtle creek have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 6.1% in Bartlett.
- In Bartlett, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 8.7% in Turtle creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.