Demographics details for Turner, OR vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Turner, OR vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Turner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,422 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $101,292 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Turner vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 2,422 in Turner.
- Residents in Turner have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Turner at 61.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 5% in Turner.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Turner.
Demographics
Demographics Turner vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Turner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 85 |
| White | 77 | 6 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Turner vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 0% in Turner.
- Turner has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Turner at 2% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Turner at 16% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Turner at 5% compared to 4% in Union city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Turner and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Turner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Turner vs Union city
- More residents in Turner report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Turner at 28.2% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 13.7% in Turner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Turner at 18.0% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 33.6% in Turner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Turner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Turner | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (311) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (223) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.3% (564) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Turner vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Turner.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 12.8% in Turner.
- More residents in Turner have less than a high school education at 9.2% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Turner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 17.3% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.