Demographics details for Turner, OR vs Locust grove, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Turner, OR vs Locust grove, GA.
| Data | Turner | Locust grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,422 | 10,734 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $101,292 | $67,143 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Turner vs Locust grove
- The population in Locust grove is higher at 10,734, compared to 2,422 in Turner.
- Residents in Turner have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.1 years in Locust grove.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292 compared to $67,143 in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Turner at 61.0% compared to 26.0% in Locust grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Locust grove at 6%, compared to 5% in Turner.
- Locust grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Turner.
Demographics
Demographics Turner vs Locust grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Turner | Locust grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 37 |
| White | 77 | 50 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Turner vs Locust grove
- In Locust grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 0% in Turner.
- Turner has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 50% in Locust grove.
- The Asian population is larger in Turner at 2% compared to 1% in Locust grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Turner at 16% compared to 8% in Locust grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Turner at 5% compared to 4% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Turner and Locust grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Turner | Locust grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Turner vs Locust grove
- More residents in Turner report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Locust grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Turner at 28.2% compared to 21.0% in Locust grove.
- Locust grove has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 13.7% in Turner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Turner at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Locust grove.
- Locust grove has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 33.6% in Turner.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Turner and Locust grove at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Turner | Locust grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (311) | 17.0% (1,824) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (223) | 6.2% (663) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.3% (564) | 12.7% (1,367) |
Education Levels Comparison: Turner vs Locust grove
- In Locust grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Turner.
- In Locust grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 12.8% in Turner.
- More residents in Turner have less than a high school education at 9.2% compared to 6.2% in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Turner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 12.7% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.