Demographics details for Turner, OR vs Covina, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Turner, OR vs Covina, CA.
| Data | Turner | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,422 | 49,489 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $101,292 | $89,650 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Turner vs Covina
- The population in Covina is higher at 49,489, compared to 2,422 in Turner.
- Residents in Turner have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 37.6 years in Covina.
- Turner has a higher median income of $101,292 compared to $89,650 in Covina.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Turner at 61.0% compared to 38.0% in Covina.
- The poverty level is higher in Covina at 12%, compared to 5% in Turner.
- Covina has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.5% in Turner.
Demographics
Demographics Turner vs Covina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Turner | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 77 | 18 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 63 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Turner vs Covina
- In Covina, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Turner.
- Turner has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 18% in Covina.
- In Covina, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Turner.
- Covina has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 16% in Turner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covina at 19%, compared to 5% in Turner.
- In Covina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Turner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Turner | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 13.7% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 33.6% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Turner vs Covina
- More residents in Turner report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Covina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Turner at 28.2% compared to 15.9% in Covina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Turner at 13.7% compared to 10.5% in Covina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Turner at 18.0% compared to 15.6% in Covina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Turner at 33.6% compared to 28.2% in Covina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Covina at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Turner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Turner | Covina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (753) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (311) | 17.4% (8,620) |
| Less than High School | 9.2% (223) | 17.2% (8,533) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.3% (564) | 18.7% (9,254) |
Education Levels Comparison: Turner vs Covina
- In Covina, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Turner.
- In Covina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.4% compared to 12.8% in Turner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covina at 17.2%, compared to 9.2% in Turner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Turner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 18.7% in Covina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.