Environment details: Tulsa OK
poor quality; significant risks reported.
Environment details: Picayune MS
Average quality, sufficient for most.
Compare Environment: Tulsa OK vs Picayune MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Tulsa | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 702 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality; significant risks reported. | Average quality, sufficient for most. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.76 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 41 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Tulsa vs Picayune
- The water quality in Picayune is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Tulsa.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Tulsa with 1.76 compared to 1.6 in Picayune.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Tulsa at 41 compared to 32 in Picayune.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.