Demographics details for Tulsa, OK vs Peachtree city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tulsa, OK vs Peachtree city, GA.
| Data | Tulsa | Peachtree city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 411,867 | 39,562 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 44.2 years |
| Median Income | $56,648 | $111,850 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Tulsa vs Peachtree city
- In Tulsa, the population is higher at 411,867, compared to 39,562 in Peachtree city.
- The median age in Peachtree city is higher at 44.2 years, compared to 35.6 years in Tulsa.
- Peachtree city has a higher median income of $111,850, compared to $56,648 in Tulsa.
- In Peachtree city, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in Tulsa.
- Tulsa has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 6% in Peachtree city.
- The unemployment rate in Tulsa is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Peachtree city.
Demographics
Demographics Tulsa vs Peachtree city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tulsa | Peachtree city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 9 |
| White | 48 | 69 |
| Asian | 3 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tulsa vs Peachtree city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tulsa at 15% compared to 9% in Peachtree city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Peachtree city at 69% compared to 48% in Tulsa.
- In Peachtree city, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Tulsa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tulsa at 17% compared to 8% in Peachtree city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tulsa at 13% compared to 6% in Peachtree city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tulsa at 4% compared to 0% in Peachtree city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tulsa | Peachtree city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 26.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tulsa vs Peachtree city
- More residents in Tulsa report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.2% in Peachtree city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tulsa at 25.2% compared to 19.8% in Peachtree city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tulsa at 18.7% compared to 10.0% in Peachtree city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Peachtree city at 17.5% compared to 13.3% in Tulsa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tulsa at 38.1% compared to 26.5% in Peachtree city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tulsa at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Peachtree city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tulsa | Peachtree city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (5,029) | 0.2% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (57,640) | 9.0% (3,554) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (56,774) | 2.6% (1,023) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (89,557) | 39.6% (15,684) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tulsa vs Peachtree city
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Peachtree city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Peachtree city.
- More residents in Tulsa have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 2.6% in Peachtree city.
- In Peachtree city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 21.7% in Tulsa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.