Demographics details for Tulsa, OK vs Lamesa, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tulsa, OK vs Lamesa, TX.
| Data | Tulsa | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 411,867 | 8,425 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,648 | $39,434 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Tulsa vs Lamesa
- In Tulsa, the population is higher at 411,867, compared to 8,425 in Lamesa.
- Residents in Tulsa have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
- Tulsa has a higher median income of $56,648 compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tulsa at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
- The poverty level is higher in Lamesa at 18%, compared to 16% in Tulsa.
- Lamesa has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Tulsa.
Demographics
Demographics Tulsa vs Lamesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tulsa | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 3 |
| White | 48 | 5 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 73 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 19 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tulsa vs Lamesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tulsa at 15% compared to 3% in Lamesa.
- Tulsa has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Tulsa at 3% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 17% in Tulsa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lamesa at 19%, compared to 13% in Tulsa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tulsa at 4% compared to 0% in Lamesa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tulsa | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tulsa vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.6% in Tulsa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tulsa at 25.2% compared to 24.0% in Lamesa.
- Lamesa has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.7% in Tulsa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lamesa at 15.6% compared to 13.3% in Tulsa.
- Lamesa has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 38.1% in Tulsa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Tulsa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tulsa | Lamesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (5,029) | 3.3% (278) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (57,640) | 18.4% (1,547) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (56,774) | 34.2% (2,881) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (89,557) | 8.7% (736) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tulsa vs Lamesa
- In Lamesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 1.2% in Tulsa.
- In Lamesa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 14.0% in Tulsa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lamesa at 34.2%, compared to 13.8% in Tulsa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.