Demographics details for Tulsa, OK vs Hollister, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tulsa, OK vs Hollister, CA.
| Data | Tulsa | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 411,867 | 44,218 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,648 | $95,764 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Tulsa vs Hollister
- In Tulsa, the population is higher at 411,867, compared to 44,218 in Hollister.
- Residents in Tulsa have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 33.5 years in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher median income of $95,764, compared to $56,648 in Tulsa.
- In Hollister, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Tulsa.
- Tulsa has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.9% in Tulsa.
Demographics
Demographics Tulsa vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tulsa | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 48 | -1 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 29 |
| American Indian | 4 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Tulsa vs Hollister
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tulsa at 15% compared to 1% in Hollister.
- Tulsa has a higher percentage of White residents at 48% compared to -1% in Hollister.
- Both Tulsa and Hollister have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Hollister has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 17% in Tulsa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 29%, compared to 13% in Tulsa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tulsa at 4% compared to 2% in Hollister.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tulsa | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tulsa vs Hollister
- More residents in Tulsa report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.0% in Hollister.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tulsa at 25.2% compared to 18.3% in Hollister.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tulsa at 18.7% compared to 12.3% in Hollister.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hollister at 17.2% compared to 13.3% in Tulsa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tulsa at 38.1% compared to 31.9% in Hollister.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tulsa at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Hollister.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tulsa | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (5,029) | 2.2% (952) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (57,640) | 14.8% (6,534) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (56,774) | 22.3% (9,855) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (89,557) | 10.1% (4,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tulsa vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Tulsa.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 14.0% in Tulsa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hollister at 22.3%, compared to 13.8% in Tulsa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.1% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.