Demographics details for Tulsa, OK vs Crawfordsville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tulsa, OK vs Crawfordsville, IN.
| Data | Tulsa | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 411,867 | 16,479 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,648 | $46,918 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Tulsa vs Crawfordsville
- In Tulsa, the population is higher at 411,867, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
- The median age in Crawfordsville is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 35.6 years in Tulsa.
- Tulsa has a higher median income of $56,648 compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tulsa at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
- Tulsa has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 13% in Crawfordsville.
- The unemployment rate in Tulsa is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.
Demographics
Demographics Tulsa vs Crawfordsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tulsa | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 48 | 84 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tulsa vs Crawfordsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tulsa at 15% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawfordsville at 84% compared to 48% in Tulsa.
- The Asian population is larger in Tulsa at 3% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tulsa at 17% compared to 8% in Crawfordsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tulsa at 13% compared to 6% in Crawfordsville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tulsa at 4% compared to 0% in Crawfordsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tulsa | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tulsa vs Crawfordsville
- More residents in Tulsa report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crawfordsville at 26.1% versus 25.2% in Tulsa.
- Crawfordsville has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 18.7% in Tulsa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawfordsville at 16.6% compared to 13.3% in Tulsa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tulsa at 38.1% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Tulsa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tulsa | Crawfordsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (5,029) | 0.7% (114) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (57,640) | 23.1% (3,814) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (56,774) | 19.9% (3,274) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (89,557) | 10.4% (1,714) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tulsa vs Crawfordsville
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
- In Crawfordsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 14.0% in Tulsa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawfordsville at 19.9%, compared to 13.8% in Tulsa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tulsa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.