Demographics details for Tullahoma, TN vs Syracuse, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Tullahoma, TN vs Syracuse, NY.

Data Tullahoma Syracuse
Population 20,830 144,451
Median Age 40.2 years 31.9 years
Median Income $56,771 $43,584
Married Families 41.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Tullahoma vs Syracuse

  • The population in Syracuse is higher at 144,451, compared to 20,830 in Tullahoma.
  • Residents in Tullahoma have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 31.9 years in Syracuse.
  • Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771 compared to $43,584 in Syracuse.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Tullahoma at 41.0% compared to 22.0% in Syracuse.
  • Tullahoma has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Syracuse.
  • Syracuse has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.

Demographics

Demographics Tullahoma vs Syracuse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Tullahoma Syracuse
Black 6 29
White 83 45
Asian 2 7
Hispanic 5 10
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Syracuse

  • In Syracuse, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 6% in Tullahoma.
  • Tullahoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 45% in Syracuse.
  • In Syracuse, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Tullahoma.
  • Syracuse has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Syracuse at 8%, compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
  • In Syracuse, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Tullahoma.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Tullahoma Syracuse
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 20.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 15.0%
Depression 28.9% 26.9%
Smoking 22.6% 26.9%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 14.0%
Obesity 39.1% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Syracuse

  • In Syracuse, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.9% in Tullahoma.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 28.9% compared to 26.9% in Syracuse.
  • Syracuse has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 22.6% in Tullahoma.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Tullahoma at 15.1% compared to 14.0% in Syracuse.
  • Syracuse has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 39.1% in Tullahoma.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Syracuse.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Tullahoma Syracuse
No Schooling 0.6% (117) 1.8% (2,595)
High School Diploma 18.9% (3,932) 12.7% (18,391)
Less than High School 14.1% (2,944) 14.1% (20,347)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (4,012) 18.5% (26,759)

Education Levels Comparison: Tullahoma vs Syracuse

  • In Syracuse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Tullahoma.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 12.7% in Syracuse.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 14.1%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Syracuse.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.