Demographics details for Tullahoma, TN vs Freeport, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tullahoma, TN vs Freeport, IL.
| Data | Tullahoma | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,830 | 23,413 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 43.4 years |
| Median Income | $56,771 | $44,658 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Tullahoma vs Freeport
- The population in Freeport is higher at 23,413, compared to 20,830 in Tullahoma.
- The median age in Freeport is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771 compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tullahoma at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Freeport.
- Tullahoma has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Tullahoma vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tullahoma | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 14 |
| White | 83 | 68 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Freeport
- In Freeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 6% in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 68% in Freeport.
- Both Tullahoma and Freeport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeport at 10%, compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tullahoma and Freeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tullahoma | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Freeport
- More residents in Tullahoma report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Freeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 28.9% compared to 22.3% in Freeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 22.6% compared to 20.6% in Freeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeport at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Freeport has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 39.1% in Tullahoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Tullahoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tullahoma | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (117) | 0.9% (206) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,932) | 19.8% (4,646) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (2,944) | 12.2% (2,845) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (4,012) | 12.9% (3,011) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tullahoma vs Freeport
- In Freeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Tullahoma.
- In Freeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- More residents in Tullahoma have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 12.2% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 12.9% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.